Archive for January, 2002

Reality versus the Macworld Hype

Monday, January 7th, 2002

Well, the Airport connection wasn’t working inside the main hall at Moscone Center in San Francisco, where Steve Jobs gave his keynote speech for the Macworld show. Jobs’s famous Reality Distortion Field was on high beam, however.

Actually, I don’t mean that as cruelly as it sounded. Apple did introduce some very cool new products — two in particular, the new iMacs and the iPhoto software package — so the event was certainly worth attending. I predict major success for the highest-end iMac in particular, and iPhoto solves problems that amateur digital photographers never realized they had.

But Jobs’ speech didn’t come close to matching the pre-show hype, which was fed not just by the rumor sites but by Apple itself.

The hype came thudding to earth when Time magazine’s Canadian-edition Web site put up the story on Sunday afternoon. You have to hand it to Apple, though, getting millions in free advertising from Time for products that simply don’t deserve it. The Time cover story, coming on the heels of the ridiculous naming of Rudy Giuliani as “Person of the Year,” would embarrass people at AOL Time Warner if they had a better-developed sense of journalistic shame.

Again, this isn’t to say that Jobs’ announcements were entirely vapid. There’s at least some meat on those bones.

The new iMac is beautiful industrial design, no doubt about it. And the most expensive model, which like others comes with an LCD flat screen, also boasts the “Superdrive” DVD recorder and lots of power (G4, 60G hard disk, etc.). At $1,800 it’s a deal. I’ve ordered one.

I’m wondering, at the same time, how Apple expects to keep selling the much more expensive G4 tower models once these iMacs hit the street. Yes, there’s more expansion potential in the PowerMac, and you can run a bigger monitor off of it. But I have to believe the new iMacs could cannibalize sales of the tower machines — unless the widely rumored G5 tower models are just around the corner. Pure speculation, of course.

The bigger iBook didn’t do much for me, though some users will crave the larger screen. I hope they’ve made the keyboard better.

iPhoto, the image software, is a great product, period. It’s free for the download from Apple’s Web site, but I’d pay for it. For amateur photographers this will be a godsend — an easy way to get pictures onto disk drives, sort and edit the pictures and then publish them to paper, the Web, in a book, you name it. This is Apple at its finest.

There are some things I’d like to see in the software, including a slider that let you change the image density and see how it will look on a Web page at higher or lower density and size. Avie Tevanian, head of software at Apple, told me this is on the list for the next version.

But there was no iWalk, the rumored PDA. No G5 desktop. No wireless breakthrough. In short, there was not enough to justify the massive come-on suggesting a revolution.

What we got was good enough in any other atmosphere. Still, reality distortion eventually has its costs.

  • More coverage of Macworld today: Dave lists press reports and blogs here. I’m under Press reports, which is a matter of opinion, I guess… ;)

    Comments

  • Titanium Follies

    Sunday, January 6th, 2002

    I’m in the middle of reinstalling my OS and apps on my new Titanium G4 PowerBook for the second time this weekend. It’s clear now that I can’t install anything and be sure it’s not going to cause a corruption disaster when I’m hooked up to the box that runs an external monitor and other peripherals for that computer and my IBM ThinkPad, allowing me to use a single desktop keyboard and LCD display for both.

    The first collapse came when I tried loading Virtual PC 5. The system went dead and wouldn’t boot. Total reinstall required.

    This time, several OS X applications got corrupted, and apps in Classic mode weren’t operating properly, either. Gee, this is fun.

    From now on, I’m installing new apps with only one connection — the Ethernet cable. Sigh…

    By the way, in response to my complaints about the OS X user interface, I got one bit of excellent advice. FruitMenu from Unsanity gives back control over the Apple menu. I’m sending my $7 today…

    Comments

    Macworld, Mac OS and More

    Sunday, January 6th, 2002

    Like most reporters who follows the ever-amazing adventures of Apple Computer, I’m heading to San Francisco early tomorrow for Steve Jobs’ keynote speech at the annual Macworld expo and conference at Moscone Center. if it lives up to the pre-event hype and speculation (it rarely does) this should be fun.

    The speculation, as always, centers around what amazing new thing Jobs will announce and/or demonstrate. I’m beginning to think the rumors of the iWalk (Wired article about original SpyMac “sighting”) just may be true.

    Who knows? Apple people, and they aren’t talking.

    They weren’t even talking to me for a pre-show column about OS X. I asked to interview some of the software folks and was turned down on the grounds that they were “to busy” — an excuse that absolutely enraged someone with high-up connections at Apple who wrote me a letter this morning to offer assistance in the future.

    Actually, I now consider it bizarrely hilarious that Apple refuses so consistently to talk with me. Consider that Microsoft, a company that you’d expect would give me the cold shoulder, is always willing to talk about issues. Sometimes it’s pulling teeth with MIcrosoft, sometimes they stonewall and sometimes they mislead or lie, but they generally find someone to talk.

    Anyway, here’s what I wrote about OS X.

    Note: Continuing the Apple community’s ability to make stupid public-relations decisions, Dave notes that the Macworld conference won’t give press credentials to webloggers. I can understand this on some kind of general level, but there are at least a few bloggers who should have access. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

    Comments

    Linux Gains in China

    Sunday, January 6th, 2002

    On a recent trip to China I stopped by the headquarters of Red Flag, a Linux software company in Beijing, and talked about prospects for the OS in the world’s most populous nation. Here’s the column that came out of that trip.

    Now the Register, citing a Gartner survey, reports that Beijing’s municipal government signed up to use Linux for an operating system. It’s part of the move to “go legal” in a land where commercial software is widely copied.

    It’s an interesting development. Let’s see where it goes.

    Comments

    Weekend Reading

    Friday, January 4th, 2002

  • Frank Rich (NYT): Patriotism on the cheap. There’s a vacuum of leadership in defining what real patriotism might be for the many Americans who are not in uniform but who came together on Sept. 11, eager to be part of a national mobilization even if they weren’t packing off to war themselves.
  • Doc Searls (Linux Journal): Whither Lindows. The question for me is, can they do it alone? Clearly Lindows is a closed-source company building a product with open source code and tools. Do they really need to close the source?
  • Steve Gillmor (Infoworld): Man in the White Suit. Now comes the disruptive part: “If you have enough cars on the highway then each car acts as a base station,” Garahi says. “Just imagine if we were to put one of these radios on every [Ford] Taurus. Within a year’s production, you have more base stations than all the cellular companies have combined in the United States to feed these units.”

    Comments

  • What Will Apple Announce Next?

    Thursday, January 3rd, 2002

    The speculation is rampant that Apple is getting ready to announce a killer PDA at the Macworld show next week. I’m skeptical, but it would be great to see something new that moves the bar up in a category that has gotten somewhat stagnant in the past year or so.

    I can’t get to the page, but the SpyMac site has pictures of something that looks like an iPod music handheld but which apparently operates like a PDA. These kinds of pictures, sometimes real and sometimes not, show up on various Mac sites all the time.

    My own Macworld prediction — or at least a prediction for sometime this year — is a version of Mac OS X Server that runs on Intel-compatible computers. That would be a great idea and a smart product. When I put this guess in my annual predictions quiz, someone told me that it would never happen because Microsoft wouldn’t allow it.

    Anyway, it’s fun to speculate.

    Comments

    Patent Garbage

    Thursday, January 3rd, 2002

    O’Reilly Network: Patent threat to W3C’s RDF technology. Applications that use Resource Description Framework (RDF), a W3C technology based on XML, are under threat from patent claims. Such applications potentially include the popular Mozilla browser and any program processing RSS files.

    Comments

    2002 Predictions

    Wednesday, January 2nd, 2002

    What will the latest federal judge hearing the Microsoft antitrust case do? Your guess is as good as mine.

    Here’s my annual predictions quiz. See if you agree.

    Comments

    OS X Prospects

    Wednesday, January 2nd, 2002

    Surprisingly, there’s still a great deal of speculation about the future of Mac OS X, Apple’s latest and operating system.

    Two people I respect — Henry Norr of the San Francisco Chronicle and Andrew Orlowski of the Register — have ditched OS X for now and gone back to OS 9, they report in recent columns. I share their qualms, and have several of my own, but I’m not going back except for some highly specific purposes.

    OS X is too slow, and most applications aren’t up to snuff yet. I also agree with critics who think the user interface has a long way to go before it’ll be as useful as the one it replaces.

    Why on earth, for example, can’t I run Finder the same way it works in OS 9? I like it the old way. Apple doesn’t care.

    And why can’t I customize the Apple menu as I could the old one? This is irritating.

    But the value of stability in the underlying OS is, simply, the one thing that keeps me running OS X. The too-frequent crashing I experience in the most up-to-date version of OS 9 on an iBook reminds me of pre-NT versions of Windows. What I gain from not having to reboot frequently would be worth the drawbacks, even if OS X didn’t have some good features.

    OS X is a work in progress. It’s going to get better. The speed is bound to improve as Apple optimizes the code. Sooner or later, I hope, Apple will give third-party programmers the information they need to let me customize the UI shell to my liking, not Steve Jobs’ dictates.

    Comments