Archive for September, 2004

Debate Questions for the Candidates

Wednesday, September 29th, 2004

It’s a time-honored exercise before presidential debates for journalists to suggest some of the questions the moderators might ask the candidates. Two approaches are evident this year:

  • Editor & Publisher, a trade journal, asked prominent journalists for ideas.
  • MediaChannel.org asked the readers.

    Seems to me the readers — the general public — did just as good a job, if not better, at framing some key issues. We could learn something from this.

    What are your questions? Post them below.

    Comments


    Posted by: on September 29, 2004 02:40 PM

    Mr. Bush: how many US solders have died in Iraq?
    Follow up: How many Iraqis have died in this war?


    Posted by: on September 29, 2004 03:00 PM

    Now, c’mon, they’re not going to ask any obviously biased questions. Get serious. How about this:

    Q: What is your plan for correcting the long-term insolvency of Social Security and Medicare as the Baby Boomers reture?


    Posted by: on September 29, 2004 03:00 PM

    “retire”


    Posted by: on September 29, 2004 03:03 PM

    Here’s another:

    Q: How will you develop policies towards China as it develops into a major world power?


    Posted by: on September 29, 2004 03:03 PM

    Mr. Bush, if, as you claim, the American people support the Iraq war, why not ask us to pay for it with our taxes, instead of borrowing money from our children?


    Posted by: Alternative Energy on September 29, 2004 03:28 PM

    Although experts disagree over exactly how many decades, it is generally agreed that the readily recoverable oil will run out sometime this century. How are we preparing for the transition to a post-oil age?


    Posted by: on September 29, 2004 06:02 PM

    Do you believe that US institutions such as executive, legislative, judicial, lobbyists, and democracy are well balanced? What reforms would you implement to maintain balance and quality in the american way of life?

    Kieran


    Posted by: on September 29, 2004 06:19 PM

    Gentlemen: Why won’t your parties and the Commission on Presidential Debates allow third party candidates who are on the ballot in a majority of states to join this debate?

    As a follow up, why won’t your parties and the Commission allow you to *debate* each other directly rather than answer selected questions on topics chosen before the event?


    Posted by: frank on September 29, 2004 09:00 PM

    Does the free trade agreement around the world allow for the third world to rise or fall further? This is a question I would like to ask the future president.


    Posted by: on September 30, 2004 07:51 AM

    Mr. Bush: since you define yourself as a Christian, how do reconcile the Bible’s and Christian tradition prohibiting lying?
    As you lied on WMD’s in Iraq, doesn’t this make you a hypocrite?

    This one is stolen from a caller on WGN radio:
    For both of them.
    Would you support Pete Rose going into the Baseball Hall Of Fame?


    Posted by: on September 30, 2004 10:56 AM

    If elected, what mind control gimmicks will your administration use in the next 4 years to keep the American people off balance and in the limbic spin zone?

    1)Flashing orange lights or a new color scheme?

    2) Fear oF Forfeited Freedom, or a new alliteration?

    3) The same old Tired TTTTT TerrorisT Threatttt?

    4) The “They” who lurk at the edge of our “Village” and hate our Free-king-dom-come?

    5) Nuclear Nightmare or Mushroom Monday?

    6) Any fresh new tricks?

    7) Will we still have to take our shoes off at the airport and spin 3 times while the guy with medical glove fingers our toothbrush after having done something else with the same outside of it, or will the charade end?

    Incurious minds want to know.


    Posted by: on September 30, 2004 11:52 AM

    For Shrub – would you like a pretzel?

    For Jane Fonda Kerry – Earlier this month on the Leherer report, the US stooge and puppet, Allawi said that the US was being kept safe from Al Quida attacks by the ongoing mayhem in occupied Iraq. Yesterday you said to Diane Sawyer that you did not oppose this lying criminal Allawi and , in fact, wanted to support him more.

    Did those botox needles go in that deep?

    To both – the proof that the USSA is fu*ked is confirmed by your prescence here. Osama Bin Laden and Vladimir Putin both have a high price on their heads so why don’t you?

    ( My 2 e-dinars )


    Posted by: maliy glyadi suda on October 11, 2004 12:20 PM

    Oh… GOD BLESS AMERICA!

    http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/america.htm

  • Tracking Issues on Blog

    Tuesday, September 28th, 2004

    BlogPulse Campaign Radar “delivers daily analysis on politics, candidates and campaign-specific issues discussed on blogs commenting on the upcoming U.S. Presidential Election. All statistics in these trend charts represent the percentage of all blog postings relevant to the election/campaign.”

    Comments


    Posted by: M. Mortazavi on September 28, 2004 09:40 PM

    Media’s treatment of presidential elections is the subject of a recent Lawrence Lessig blog here: http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/002175.shtml. I’ve also written about it here: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/MortazaviBlog/20040928#media_as_theater_or_theatre .

    However, as I noted earlier, I think weblogging is not a panacea for social and political maladies. It has the potential of actually aggravating the problem: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/MortazaviBlog/20040915#weblogging_is_not_a_panacea .

    Explaining Journalism’s New World to Newsmakers

    Tuesday, September 28th, 2004

    I’m giving a workshop talk next week at the Web 2.0 conference about a theme of the book: the impact of content-creating technology on newsmakers, and why they should also be using it themselves. Disclosure: One of the conference producers is the book’s publisher, O’Reilly Media.

    Comments

    Open Thread

    Sunday, September 26th, 2004

    I’m heading to New York today for a couple of talks/conferences. Chat below. Please behave.

    Comments


    Posted by: on September 26, 2004 07:58 AM

    Going to New York eh!?

    Oh behave indeed! You hound, Dan. I hope you don’t catch anything.

    Now what just happened?

    The new media broke through and I don’t mean the bleating sheep of the lunar right bogosphere.
    I mean we the media in the sense of ‘ we the new super-power ‘truly liberated digi-media.
    The corpse media’s circulations been dropping harder than Oscar De La Hoya; they’ve been caught lying about that and countless other matters large and small. They’ve been pirated into the ground and humbled before the world yet thats really no great surprise,after all, they’re old, we’re young and that’s life.

    We the new media should take a minute to celebrate along with that dog, Dan G.
    ( yoda man D!)
    I would suggest a fine Australian shiraz or white Bergundy, maybe even a cleansing ale. SALUD, VIVA free media and see you later alligators.


    Posted by: Seth Finkelstein on September 27, 2004 04:57 PM

    People might enjoy my blog post investigating a parallel, right-wing PR firm track, pushing the Rather/CBS memos story. This was an early publicizing of the story which did NOT involve blogs, and later seems to have merged with the blog track.

    http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000702.html

    Florida Doesn’t Deserve This

    Saturday, September 25th, 2004

    Hurricane JeanneMy thoughts are with the people of Florida, who are about to get hit yet again by nature’s worst. Here’s the Red Cross donation page if you want to help.

    (Photo via NOAA)

    Comments


    Posted by: steve on September 25, 2004 02:54 PM

    I was chatting with a friend who is a climatologist at NCAR. While this can’t be correleated with global warming, global warming is likely to make this sort of thing more common in the future – energy into the water is what drives hurricanes.

    He said it wouldn’t be surprising to see a half dozen category 3+ storms hit a place like Florida in four or five decades as the yearly norm. At some point it becomes too expensive to live in a place like that.

    The real question is” “when will people in the US start to get serious about global warming?” Perhaps the silver lining of events like this is that it might begin to sensitize voters.


    Posted by: on September 25, 2004 03:10 PM

    Did you ever think that maybe Florida is being punished for what it did to us in the 2000 election?
    This is a warning for this election!


    Posted by: on September 25, 2004 03:21 PM

    Very amusing. Want to explain what the 1100 people dead in Haiti did to piss the weather gods off so badly?


    Posted by: on September 25, 2004 06:12 PM

    They approved of Bush’s policies.


    Posted by: Buzz Bruggeman on September 25, 2004 07:12 PM

    Dan:

    Come on down, it is really blowing. Storm is supposed to hit here at dawn. This could be the worst one yet!

    Buzz


    Posted by: Spyware Remover on September 26, 2004 03:15 PM

    This has nothing to do with global warming for Pete’s sake, it’s just a historical, albeit nasty, cycle that these weather patterns create.

    Now, that doesn’t make it any easier for all those people on the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts.

    A word to the wise, ocean front property will go cheap down there in the next couple of years, so if you buy in, don’t live there until ~2011+ when the current crazy weather patterns settle down. At that time you’ll be set for about 40 years.

    AJ


    Posted by: on September 26, 2004 07:05 PM

    What the people of Haiti did was to cut down most of the trees, thus creating an environmental disaster. The water isn’t soaked up by the roots, and it just runs off, washing out the soil, causing massive flooding and mudslides.

    That’s what the people of Haiti did, they have destroyed their own land. Find an aerial or satellite photo of Hispaniola, you can see the dividing line between the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Haiti has no trees left!


    Posted by: anders on September 26, 2004 10:23 PM

    2000 election vs. hurricanes 2004

    http://www.bartcop.com/message-from-God.gif

    A message from god?

    Personally I think some people have got too much time on their hands but what do I know


    Posted by: on September 27, 2004 04:08 AM

    I have absolutely zero sympathy for Florida.

    If you built your houses correctly, you would not have a problem.

    How do I *KNOW*? I live on an island in the middle of typhoon alley. There’s no place to evacuate to. This season we’ve had just as many typhoons hit as hurricanes have hit Florida. Nobody’s roofs got blow off, nobody died, nobody homeless, minimal property damage (cars getting wacked by flying things, mostly).

    Oh, BTW, building correctly means not putting your god-damned million dollar plus, shittly built house directly on the freaking beach… f-ing morons… you deserve exactly what you got, plus a little more for good measure.

    What I find particularly delicious is that most of those folks could have defraid their building costs by a couple of hundred thousand dollars with a FEMA grant.

    http://www.monolithicdome.com/plan_design/FEMA/

    Meanwhile FEMA ships trailer homes to the Florida hurricane homeless (people who wouldn’t know a grant from a hole in the ground), resulting in them becomming homeless *TWICE* in a season despite the fact that disaster relief container homes

    http://www.commetasa.com/ingles/products5.htm

    provides safe, cheap, effective, quickly deployed emergency housing to folks who have lost their homes in a natural disasters.

    Sometimes American government is increadly fscked in the head that it’s hard to imagine a more third world first world country.


    Posted by: on September 27, 2004 11:19 AM

    A Message from God?

    Interesting. THat map indicates that Orange County, Volusia County and others didn’t get hit by Frances or Charley. Sorry, those 2 counties got hit severely and voted for Gore.


    Posted by: M. Mortazavi on September 28, 2004 09:35 PM

    Because of the hurricane, I had to cancel a trip to Orlando: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/MortazaviBlog/20040926#should_i_go_or_should.

    This would have been my first trip to Florida ever. My only hope is that my colleagues who did make it and those who live near the most devasted areas remain physically safe.

    The Toxic Foxification of News

    Sunday, September 19th, 2004
  • Frank Rich (NY Times): This Time Bill O’Reilly Got It Right. No matter how long the overlap between Mr. Carville and Mr. Begala’s TV and campaign roles, that brand and CNN itself are now as inextricably bound to the Democrats as Fox is to the Republicans. The network has succeeded in an impossible feat — ceding Mr. O’Reilly the moral high ground. The Bush campaign doesn’t have to enlist Fox hosts for its staff since they’re willing to whore for it without even being asked.

  • Comments


    Posted by: on September 19, 2004 02:05 PM

    So, the next time the Merc runs an op-ed piece from Alexander Cockburn, it magically turns into “socialist fishwrap”?

    The problem with Faux News isn’t that it has openly-partisan talk show hosts. It’s that management has blurred (some would say “erased”) the line between “news” and “commentary”.

    Frankly, Faux isn’t even CNN’s real competition anymore: that role belongs to Google News, which provides the same up-to-the-minute information, with an even wider range of perspectives. anyplace you have access to a computer.

    If it remains in its current form, CNN is probably doomed to becoming a sort of “Newzak” for use in airport waiting rooms and similar PC-less venues.


    Posted by: on September 19, 2004 08:33 PM

    First, I do not watch O’Reilly because his views are too extreme, even for me. But he is like the WWF in that he is positioned as entertainment, rather than serious news. I don’t watch Hardball with Chris Matthews for the same reason. Or Larry King or Joe Scarbrough or any of the myriad other “news” journalists, with “fair & balanced reporting,” be they Fox, MSNBC, CNN, etc. These are one and all political commentary rather than news organizations. Don’t just talk about Fox; the others are tarred with the same brush, only their bias is toward the left, rather than the right.

    But when a major news organization, such as CBS or the New York Times, or for that matter, the Merc goes from reporting factual news to news with a pronounced bias, then we have a credibility problem. A NEWS organization is by definition, a reporter of fact, not opinion. An editorial is an appropriate forum for opinion, not the front page or the lead story. Once that corner is turned, the news organization has as much credibility as the National Enquirer. ABC turned that corner several years ago and has now been joined by CBS.

    I, for one, do not need a talking head to tell me how to think, or what the speaker said. I do require complete access to the news in order to reach my own conclusions.


    Posted by: on September 19, 2004 09:28 PM

    Mr. Rich got it wrong (an even rarer occurance than Mr. O’Reilly’s getting it right). Crossfire is clearly a shouting match (would it were a debate, but, alas, not in our era) between partisan sides. The show is more valuable for having voices that are authentically connected with the Kerry campaign. Better to focus attention on the so-called neutral reporters who debase their journalistic calling by failing o challenge or investigate claims made by the spin-meisters of both parties.


    Posted by: on September 19, 2004 09:29 PM

    Mr. Rich got it wrong (an even rarer occurance than Mr. O’Reilly’s getting it right). Crossfire is clearly a shouting match (would it were a debate, but, alas, not in our era) between partisan sides. The show is more valuable for having voices that are authentically connected with the Kerry campaign. Better to focus attention on the so-called neutral reporters who abandon their journalistic reponsibility by simply parotting and failing to challenge or investigate claims made by the spin-meisters of both parties.


    Posted by: on September 20, 2004 04:17 AM

    Phil Wade: you seem to be oblivious of the distinction between news reporting and news analysis.


    Posted by: FryGuy on September 20, 2004 05:42 AM

    Just wanted to say that I read your book and absolutely loved it. I truly believe that the Internet and blogs are the future of journalism.

    Thanks for writing something that all bloggers should read.

    S.M. Mullis
    http://fnn.blogspot.com
    http://3aday.blogspot.com


    Posted by: francine hardaway on September 20, 2004 08:20 AM

    As someone who has been blogging for five years, I just pray that grassroots journalism grows even more quickly than it already is. Between Fox, CBS, and the failures of even the New York Times to report the news accurately, it is critical for thoughtful people to have alternatives.


    Posted by: on September 20, 2004 09:03 AM

    “O’Reilly because his views are too extreme”

    Anyone who thinks O’Reilly is a knee-jerk far right winger is dead wrong. Sure, he can be testy with guests. But his positions are mostly well-reasoned and he is left of center on many of them.

    “Faux isn’t even CNN’s real competition anymore”

    No, because Faux is trouncing CNN!!

    Also, can anyone explain why Frank Rich gets a weekly front-page article on NYT Sunday A&E section about politics.


    Posted by: on September 20, 2004 09:17 AM

    I’ve always thought the distinctions among news personnel might be classified as:
    //Reporting – gathering and sorting facts to present as objectively as possible a picture of events and effects
    //Analysis – putting the facts into a context of history, causes, impacts and relationships, but objectively, without “spin”
    //Opinions – making judgments based on ideology, experience or economic incentive

    Certainly the first (at least for the broadcast component) is distorted by a combination of reportorial ineptitude, marketing pressure for time and visually enticing topics, and the inability of bite-size news management to deal with complex topics. But they suffer also in the analytical category because good analysis takes time and costs money. Thus, the preponderance of superficial analysis and recycling of predigested packages of interest information.

    The rest of the pack…liberals and conservatives alike, are opinionists, more akin to talk show callers than to true journalists. But as long as the public is more concerned about Paris Hilton’s underwear than Bush’s foreign or economic policy (or Kerry’s alternatives) what more can we expect?


    Posted by: on September 20, 2004 10:51 AM

    Give it a rest Dan.

    Calling out Fox News every other week while you promote Michael Moore, and fail to even acknowledge what is coming from move0n.org just demonstrates your bias.

    ss="v1">
    Posted by: Dan Gillmor on September 20, 2004 02:01 PM

    Promote Michael Moore? Not me.


    Posted by: on September 21, 2004 04:41 PM

    Oh, and is it a coincidence that three out of the four journalistic embarassments I mentioned above painted the Bush and Blair administration in a bad light?

    Must have been a coincidence, or could it have been a toxic Foxification of the news? LMFAO!

    Book Notes

    Friday, September 17th, 2004

  • Jay Rosen and I had a long conversation at a journalism conference.
  • Bill Moyers commends the book in this speech at a recent journalism conference. (Read the whole speech; it’s extraordinary.)
  • CNN’s Christine Boese asks, Will cyber journalists turn the tables on big media?
  • Ed Brill has a four-part discussion on his website.

    Comments


    Posted by: on September 17, 2004 09:45 AM

    Dan…great interview with Jay…well worth the read…sent the link along to my list :-)


    Posted by: Ted Feuerbach on September 17, 2004 09:46 PM

    Bill Moyers is lucky (and so are we) in that his “Sole corporate funder” appears to allow him to speak his mind, even when he critisizes their own industry. One common conservative complaint about the press is that it is too liberal. I really don’t know where they get that, but the truth is the truth. Even if we don’t like it, we should hear it anyway. The first step in solving a problem is to first, recognise that a problem exists. Journalists like Moyers (and our host here) do that. I don’t always agree with their analysis or opinions, but they really do report so we can decide…

    Hey, this could be a great slogan for a news organization: “We report, you decide!” (C) Ted Feuerbach, 2004


    Posted by: on September 20, 2004 09:37 PM

    “My readers know more than I do.” I can see that this would be true in the area of technology, especially in the Silicon Valley. However, does the average web-log poster or email sender usually represent someone who “knows more” about most subjects? About the most effective policies for local governments to adopt? About how to be a good person and live a happy life? Is it possible that the readers that I hear from is a non-representative (skewed?) sample?

  • Open Thread

    Wednesday, September 15th, 2004

    I’m on the road for the next 18 hours or so. Your thoughts go below.

    Please behave.

    Comments


    Posted by: on September 15, 2004 07:27 PM

    Everyone download FireFox 1.0PR and take a look at the integrated RSS technology….Lets drop IE and Safari and have a true open cross platfrom independent browser. Way to go…

    http://www.mozilla.org/


    Posted by: Ted Feuerbach on September 15, 2004 07:28 PM

    Shhhhhhh! Dan’s not here, let’s talk about him.

    Seriously, there is a local (here in Silicon Valley) State Legislature candidate named Steve Poizner. He is a Republican who is spending millions on his campaign. Interestingly Richard Clarke, who has been slammed for his book about the Bush administration’s ignorance about terrorism before 9/11 is campaigning for him. Guess that rules out Clarke’s political motives when he wrote the book!


    Posted by: on September 15, 2004 07:39 PM

    Ted, You’re right on both counts.

    Also, Poizner has spent a considerable amount of his own money for his campaign, promising to start campaign finance reform. That’s easy enough when one is a multi-millionaire after having sold one’s company to Qualcomm (as Poizner did).

    Poizner’s opponent, Ira Raskin (sp?), has been around for a while and proven himself as an advocate for reform that’s “people-based” and not unduly influenced by wealthy special interests.

    Poizner’s campaign has run like clockwork; it’s very slick and professionally run. He has good people advising him; the best money can buy. :) )

    Raskin campaigned on my doorstep some weks ago; one thing that really impressed me about him was that he had a young lad with him – a high-school student – who had volunteered to help in is campaign. I thought he was doing a great civil work by introducing that kid to the “underbelly” of working in a political campaign. Impressive.


    Posted by: on September 15, 2004 10:42 PM

    Stock Options

    If stock options are traded publically for short periods of time, why not trade them for longer periods of time like the ones given to employees. Then the companies could expense the value of the options on market prices.

    Firefox

    Firefox 1.0PR busted almost all my extensions. The built in pop up blocker notice is nice. The find tool bar and highlighter at the bottom is nice as well. But it should predictively realize that if I type a term in a websites search box that I’ll probably want it in the find bar as well. I am also missing the Bugmenot extension and gmail compose.

    But the latest critical vulnerability is reason enough to upgrade. Dan could you read your logs and publish what % of people visiting your site are using Firefox?


    Posted by: Russ on September 16, 2004 06:47 AM

    RE Joe’s comment about us all using Firefox.

    I’m a recent adopter and upgraded to the new version. I have to say I prefer it to IE. Problem will be when it gains sufficient market share to attract all the mayhem makers. Already this application has had “holes” patched in the new version and this is just the beginning.


    Posted by: on September 16, 2004 06:56 AM

    I’ve tried firefox twice in the last 8 months. Both times I went back to mozilla for one key feature: turning off dynamic gifs. Browsing without all those flashing, blinking, epilepsy-inducing banner ads is just too important.


    Posted by: Dirk on September 16, 2004 07:19 AM

    > Both times I went back to mozilla for one key feature: turning off dynamic gifs.

    You can disable that in firefox too, no problem.


    Posted by: on September 16, 2004 08:18 AM

    Un-scientific poll here. We’re all relatively intelligent here and I’d like to know what other people are thinking.

    Please provide me with your brief prediction for the Presidential Election.

    I predict that Nader stays on the FL ballot, Bush Wins FL and goes on to win the election by a small margin.

    You?


    Posted by: FlackLikeMe on September 16, 2004 08:19 AM

    Un-scientific poll here. We’re all relatively intelligent here and I’d like to know what other people are thinking.

    Please provide me with your brief prediction for the Presidential Election.

    I predict that Nader stays on the FL ballot, Bush Wins FL and goes on to win the election by a small margin.

    You?


    Posted by: on September 16, 2004 08:58 AM

    We seem to get so distracted by potential electronic voter fraud. But we can’t lose sight of the fact that there’s still a ton of problems with the current system. Read “How to Steal an Election”

    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/09/16/how_to_steal_an_election/

    The election is still a long way off, so a lot could happen between now and then. But if things stay on an even keel, I predict Bush by a fairly respectable margin. Florida won’t be close. If the overall race is tight, Ohio could be the place to watch this year.

    And for the record, I was in the ABB camp 6-8 months ago. The Dems had this election handed to them on a plate. But I have never seen such gross incompetence and bumbling in a campaign effort. Its sad, really.


    Posted by: on September 16, 2004 11:10 AM

    Did someone else just get outted?

    The Washington Post reported that Donald W. Keyser, an ex-State Dept. official, had passed documents to Taiwanese intelligence agents and was charged with concealing a trip to Taiwan. See Powell Aide Gave Papers to Taiwan, FBI Says.

    The article also mentions that Keyser’s wife is a CIA officer, but did not mention her name. However, some simple sleuthing shows that Donald Keyser is from Virginia. Running a search for him in Google reveals a phone number. A reverse search of the phone number shows Margaret Lyons.


    Posted by: on September 16, 2004 11:15 AM

    Powell Aid Gave Papers to Taiwan, FBI Says:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24703-2004Sep15.html?nav%3Drss_politics

    Phonebook results for donald keyser va:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=donald+keyser+va&btnG=Search

    Phonebook results for (703) 690-7086:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=%28703%29+690-7086&btnG=Search


    Posted by: on September 17, 2004 03:01 AM

    Margaret Lyon is a cia agent?

    Is that what your telling us?

    MARGARET LYONS is a CIA agent?

    Some of these laws are just risible these days aren’t they. When I publish this all over Indymedia and Cryptome gets hold of it – if they haven’t already that will make a mockery of USSA law.

    As it should too, thank f*ck for the free NET and free speech and death to the CIA.

    Now as a follow up I suggest a mass civil disobedience campaign to make fools of the secret service. That is we all threaten to kill the pretzel a week from now. Get a few thousand involved and the SS are DoSed and stuffed – much like the Brits in India finally were.

    Mass civil disobedience gets the goodie’s.
    ( seasoned with a little direct action to taste of course )


    Posted by: Gerd Stodiek on September 17, 2004 05:45 AM

    FYI: Check out the first International Weblog Awards, The BOBs at http://www.thebobs.com.

    I am a freelancer for Deutsche Welle, the host of the award and blogger, an international broadcaster in 30 languages. The awards will be held in DW’s seven focus languages.

    Nominations kick off today! So nominate your favorite blog in design, innovation, topic, journalism or best weblog. You can nominate your own of course.


    Posted by: Seth Finkelstein on September 17, 2004 06:14 AM

    I’ve colleced some good forgery memo evidence links at

    http://sethf.com/cbs-memos/


    Posted by: on September 19, 2004 09:57 AM

    Thanks for your insightful and informative articles.

    I look forward to the article you plan … “build a hard-disk recording system that won’t be bound by those restrictions…”.

    Please include details and costs of integrating it with the content provider (e.g., monthly fee to connect with their broadcast schedule), hardware selection, software required, other URLs/resources, etc.

    Stephen Mehl


    Posted by: Resumes on September 20, 2004 05:57 AM

    Ahhhh… the fun resumes

    Testing the movie uploading feature

    Monday, September 13th, 2004

    newblog.movTesting the movie uploading feature of Ecto 2, beta version.

    Comments

    testing…

    Monday, September 13th, 2004

    uniqa bloggers.movTesting video function in Ecto…click on the image or this link.

    Comments